What about scope creep? Many of us have worked projects that involved
scope creep. In fact, scope creep tops
the list of over 500 managers as the single biggest problem they face (Portny,
Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, & Sutton, 2008) . Most of the time scope creep comes from
well-meaning people who want to incorporate newer technology or find a better
way of doing things. No matter the
source, it must be handled appropriately. Otherwise, the project budget for
time and resources will suffer. That’s
easy to say but much harder to do when the source is the customer. The old saying, “The customer’s always right”
is never truer than when the customer is paying your salary. If the customer wants to change the product,
the product needs to be changed. The
question becomes, How?
I wrote about a project I was
involved with in a post from mid-March.
That project ended up costing much more in time and money that was
originally budgeted, most because of scope creep. There were two sources of scope creep. No surprise, as Dr. Stolovich commented about
the commonality of scope creep (Laureate Education (Producer), n.d.). The first
was one of the people on the project with direct contact to customers other
than the main customer. Through those
contacts this person brought back ideas to add to the project because those
customers wanted them. They would
improve the product but would add to the cost.
The extra costs didn’t seem to matter as long as the customers were
satisfied. The PM was new and allowed
the ideas to be added to the project without following PM protocol.
The other source of source creep
in this project was from the main customer.
This customer came up with ideas to add to the project that would make
it better but would cost more also.
Since this was the main customer for the project, it was much more
difficult to say no for the PM. Some of
the scope creep came from both sources, so there seemed to be collaboration
between them. No matter, it wasn’t
handled properly and the project suffered.
If I had been the PM, and
knowing what I’ve learned and know now, there are a couple of things I would
have done to reduce scope creep. I don’t
think I could have eliminated it because I’ve heard of similar situations since
then. Vince Budrovich mentioned saying “NO”
will increase your wins and decrease your losses (Laureate
Education (Producer), n.d.) . This is one of the circumstances that would
not be a good idea in. So another
strategy would be to use the Scope of Work (SOW) document to stop some of the
scope creep (Laureate Education (Producer), PM
Concerns: Scope Creep, n.d.) . This one of the things I would have done in
these circumstances. The customer and the team member would have signed the
SOW. Bringing them back to it and
reminding them of it would cause them to see the project and budget that they
agreed to. They would also see how much
time and money their requests would cost above the agreed upon budget.
If that didn’t work, I could
have drafted a Change of Scope document and had them sign it. This would change the project to add the
items they wanted to add but it would show the extra cost and time those items
would add to the project. If they agreed
to them then the project would be basically a new project with new
deadlines. The Change of Scope document
would cause them to really think about how badly they wanted the additional
items. Another strategy would be to ask
the people wanting to add items to the project if they would allow the project to
move forward in its current agreement.
When it was complete the items could be reviewed and a new project could
be developed to add the improvements to the completed project. This would allow the current project to be
finished on time. Either of these
strategies would satisfy them and allow the project to complete on time.
References
Laureate Education (Producer)
(Director). (n.d.). Overcoming Scope Creep [Motion Picture].
Laureate Education (Producer)
(Director). (n.d.). PM Concerns: Scope Creep [Motion Picture].
Portny, S., Mantel, S., Meredith, J.,
Shafer, S., & Sutton, M. (2008). Project Management - Planning,
scheduling, and controlling projects. Danvers: John Wiley & Sons.
Great post as always Bobby. Greer (2010). mentioned that “Project management (PM) is not rocket science”. If this is true, why does it seem to be so stressful at times? You mentioned that “most of the time scope creep comes from well-meaning people who want to incorporate newer technology or find a better way of doing things.” I have found this to be true in most of my experiences. For me, the “creep” is always in the form of suggestions to make things “better”. But in an effort to make things better, each additional task also adds to the time demands. From my experience, even with increased demands on my time, the schedule and due dates are rarely extended
ReplyDeleteReference
Greer, M. (2010). The project management minimalist: Just enough PM to rock your projects! (Laureate custom ed.). Baltimore: Laureate Education, Inc.
Hello Bobby,
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing your experience with project scope creep, and your suggestions for how to manage it. The problem that you experienced does see to be common, as you also stated.
For example, The Standish Group’s CHAOS Summary 2009 found that:
o 32% of all projects were successful, which meant that they were delivered on time, on budget, with required features and functions, while 68% were not successful (Bisk, 2018).
Reference
Bisk (2018). Managing Scope Creep in Project Management. Retrieved from
https://www.villanovau.com/resources/project-management/project-management-scope-creep/#.WtEX24jwZPY
Hi Bobby-
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post and agree with your suggestions on how you would have handled scope creep if you were the project manager. If I had to choose one of the options on how I would have handled the project, I would have chosen to go with your last suggested strategy, which was to complete the original Scope of Project, then agree to sign a new SOW with the additional items they wanted on that project. This would make sure that the original SOW is completed on time and on budget.
Khristine